Law Offices of Richard E. Yaskin
is a NJ employment attorney, dedicated
to fighting discrimination and advancing
employment rights in New Jersey

Law Offices of
Richard E. Yaskin
A Professional Corporation

Notable employment law decisions obtained by NJ employment attorney Richard E. Yaskin

Yaskin has obtained several noteworthy employment law decisions:

  • Hoag v. Brown, 397 N.J. Super. 34 (App. Div. 2007) (Court reprioritized factors in determining that prison social worker contractor’s employee could be deemed a “protected employee” of NJ Dept. of Corrections under New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”); also, expanded negligent supervision liability and the scope of causation to recover for permanent psychological injuries under NJ Tort Claims Act).

  • Waugh v. Pathmark Stores, Inc., 191 F.R.D. 427 (D.N.J. 2000) (attempt to expand waiver of attorney-client privilege to in-house attorney's participation in remediation of racial harassment).

  • Kube v. New Penn Motor Express, 865 F. Supp. 221(D.N.J. 1994) (denying §301 pre-emption of LAD handicap accommodation claim where collective bargaining agreement did not define "reasonable accommodation" of a physical handicap aplied under the LAD).

  • Muench v. Township of Haddon, 255 N.J. Super. 288 (App. Div. 1992) (establishing a sexually hostile work environment and constructive discharge based upon gende-based harassment engaged in because the female plaintiff sought to work as a police dispatcher).

Yaskin has contributed to NELA-NJ's amicus curiae briefs addressing:

  • The doctrine of "after acquired" evidence of employee misconduct in Nicosia v. Wakefern Food Corp., 136 N.J. 401 (1994)

  • The application of judicial estoppel to bar disability discrimination claims in McNemar v. Disney Stores, Inc., 91 F.3d 610 (3d Cir. 1996) cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 958 (1997)

  • The prominence and content of employee handbook disclaimers in Jackson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 296 N.J. Super 1 (App. Div. 1996) cert. denied, 149 N.J. 141 (1997)

Yaskin was the first private attorney to represent a State-wide class of Social Security disability applicants who were denied benefits assertedly due to an unlawful regulation. Wilson v. Heckler, 622 F. Supp. 649 (D.N.J. 1985) (subsequent citations omitted).

 


As long as the world shall last, there will be wrongs, and if no man [no one] objected and no man [no one] rebelled, those wrongs would last forever.

— Clarence Darrow